<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>alchemycontent.com &#187; Paid Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alchemycontent.com/tag/paid-content/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alchemycontent.com</link>
	<description>Digital Content Production and Strategy Specialists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Question That Old Murdoch Magic?</title>
		<link>http://alchemycontent.com/blog/analog-media/question-that-old-murdoch-magic</link>
		<comments>http://alchemycontent.com/blog/analog-media/question-that-old-murdoch-magic#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tomkihl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analog Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alchemycontent.com/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So firstly the omnipresent Mr. Big of news publishing announces he is to begin charging for his newspaper’s online content. Then his company dramatically pulls the plug on their free The London Paper title. It’s a huge about turn on the direction almost all media has been taking for the last few years. So is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/worldeconomicforum/3488040165/"><img alt="" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3663/3488040165_57cd14c8b9.jpg" title="Rupert Murdoch" class="alignnone" width="545" height="365" /></a></p>
<p>So firstly the omnipresent Mr. Big of news publishing announces he is to begin charging for his newspaper’s online content. Then his company dramatically pulls the plug on their free The London Paper title.</p>
<p>It’s a huge about turn on the direction almost all media has been taking for the last few years. So is Rupert Murdoch wise or brave, foolish or foolhardy? More importantly can he, even with all his global expertise in print over decades, really know what he’s doing in a media industry struggling with the economics of giving everything away for nothing?</p>
<p>Of course not. He’s just reached a point where the losses are really rubbing him up the wrong way and is deciding to take some action on it because the alternative is looking really, really bleak for his financial model.</p>
<p><strong>A Little Savvier</strong></p>
<p>Word has it that Rupert doesn’t use a computer and can’t be contacted by email. He is certainly not a fan of digital, and this drastic move against the tide may prove to be his big mistake. The outcome is very far from certain, but to execute such a gamble, I’d prefer it if the man in charge was a little savvier with his RSS feeds.</p>
<p>There was a time when News International’s digital policies looked relatively visionary. The redesigned Times Online (albeit following The Guardian’s lead), and even the purchase of MySpace (before users realised it doesn’t actually work very well) seemed impressively committed to the game. While launching a freesheet in The London Paper showed an apparent desire to keep on the cutting edge of the new print market trends too. But these projects are now busy laying off staff just the same as at other, less well prepared media outlets. Throwing NI&#8217;s clout at the projects hasn&#8217;t made them better or more profitable than their analog or digital rivals. All is not well and charging for digital content looks like a fairly desperate about turn.</p>
<p>Forward-thinking net commentator Jeff Jarvis <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/06/rupert-murdoch-charging-for-content">said in his column last week</a>, “Newspapers have had 15 years since the launch of the internet browser to re-imagine and rebuild themselves for the reality of the post-Gutenberg age. But they didn&#8217;t. Now they are trying to reclaim old business models for a new media economy — a link economy, I call it, in which links give content value. Cut yourself off from links, behind pay walls, and you cut yourself off from the internet and its real value.”<br />
<strong><br />
Unfolding Story</strong></p>
<p>Yes, quality newspaper journalism desperately needs to find ways to be funded sufficiently enough to survive, but the new medium still being forged online relies on access to content be as fast and easy as possible. Blocked pages, registration screens, credit card demands..? Alternatives are always a single, rapid click away. </p>
<p>It’s great to see Murdoch shifting this unfolding story so significantly, but I think he’s potentially lost his touch here. He’s going against the grain too strongly in a battle that for once is much bigger than his own publishing empire.</p>
<p>Are we watching the dawn of a new sustainable age of digital news journalism, or the violent death throes of an outdated media hierarchy? Whatever happens next, it’s going to be dramatic and of huge, lasting significance. </p>
<div id="facebook_like"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Falchemycontent.com%2Fblog%2Fanalog-media%2Fquestion-that-old-murdoch-magic&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=500&amp;action=like&amp;font=segoe+ui&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:500px; height:30px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alchemycontent.com/blog/analog-media/question-that-old-murdoch-magic/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

